Armchair Hockey Scout

Ask the book

2026-27 edition Ask a direct question about this edition of the book — who, how many, how common, which group more — and it is answered with a table computed on this page from the edition’s index: the season line, height and age, the on-ice percentiles, the grades and the traits read out of every report. Ask for a view on named players — what a comparison comes down to, what makes a man — and you get the book’s reading of their own pages, and only those. The model turns your question into a query and phrases the result, or reads the pages it is handed; it never originates a figure, and an answer carrying a figure that is on neither the table nor the pages is withheld. It does not forecast, and it says so when a question is outside what the book holds.

Tables are computed on this page from the 2026-27 edition’s index; readings rest on the players’ own pages; the model never counts. Twenty questions an hour.

2026-27 edition

Every player in the league. Every night of the season.

Long-form reports written the way the old pro hockey annuals were — the finesse game, the physical game, the mental game — with the analytics that used to live inside a front office sitting underneath each one. All 32 clubs get the same read, and every game gets one before it is played.

Every figure here was computed from the league's own record. None of it was remembered, and where the record stops, this site says so instead of guessing.

750 reports in this edition ·

What is in a report

Every player gets a bio block, the numbers, and then the same four questions asked in plain language.

Last Season

What the numbers actually were, and what they hide. The stat line is the start of the argument, not the end of it.

The Finesse Game

Skating, hands, vision, the shot. What a player can do with the puck, and what he reaches for when the play breaks down.

The Physical Game

Size, strength, whether he hits, whether he can be moved off a puck, and how well the body is holding up.

The Intangibles

Temperament and honest criticism. Where a player is trending, and the thing about him nobody wants to say out loud.

What this site will not tell you

There is no scouting report before 2021-22 and there never will be. Nobody here watched those men play, and a read assembled from a stat line is a guess wearing a suit.

The league had no tracking chips in its pucks or on its players before 2021-22, which is also the first season this site can put ten named skaters on the ice for a given shot. Both halves of that sentence matter, and the second one is ours: everything measured here is reconstructed from shift charts and event coordinates — where a shot was taken from, and who was on the ice when it was taken.

The tracking feed is the league's, and no page here shows it. So a report can tell you what happened around a player and cannot tell you how fast he skated. Where one calls a man a good skater, that is a reading rather than a measurement — the largest thing in the book asserted without evidence.

That is half-fixed rather than fixed. The league's tracking record for every season it covers is now in this repository, ranked against this site's own population rather than shipped as the league's own percentile, and it sits in front of the writing from here on. Every report you can read today was written before it arrived, and not one of them has been changed to match.

The numbers reach much further back — the league's counting record starts in 1917-18, and this site has measured all 108 seasons of it. But numbers and readings are kept apart on purpose, and the record does not begin everywhere at once:

  • 1959-60 shots on goal first counted
  • 1977-78 times shorthanded first counted
  • 2009-10 goals scored four-on-four first counted

A question that lands before one of those dates gets the date as its answer, not a plausible one.

The whole record, and where the model loses →

Measured, not remembered

Seasons measured
108
Team-seasons
1,759
Reports in the archive
3,627
Editions
5

The league's eras were found by the data rather than assumed from the rule book — and when they were tested against the rule book, they failed the test. That result is published too.