This is the 2025-26 edition — an archived read. Read the 2026-27 report →
Alex Killorn
Mighty Ducks of Anaheim Left Wing
19 goals at 35 on a 14.2 per cent rate, and a plus-12 on a team that was minus-44.
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | PP | SH | GW | S | S% | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | TBL | 38 | 7 | 12 | 19 | -6 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 82 | 8.5 | 16:49 |
| 2013-14 | TBL | 82 | 17 | 24 | 41 | +8 | 63 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 173 | 9.8 | 16:47 |
| 2014-15 | TBL | 71 | 15 | 23 | 38 | +8 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 130 | 11.5 | 16:56 |
| 2015-16 | TBL | 81 | 14 | 26 | 40 | +14 | 44 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 154 | 9.1 | 16:48 |
| 2016-17 | TBL | 81 | 19 | 17 | 36 | -9 | 66 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 176 | 10.8 | 18:00 |
| 2017-18 | TBL | 82 | 15 | 32 | 47 | +22 | 45 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 156 | 9.6 | 16:30 |
| 2018-19 | TBL | 82 | 18 | 22 | 40 | +22 | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 153 | 11.8 | 14:52 |
| 2019-20 | TBL | 68 | 26 | 23 | 49 | +19 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 130 | 20.0 | 17:56 |
| 2020-21 | TBL | 56 | 15 | 18 | 33 | -1 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 121 | 12.4 | 17:54 |
| 2021-22 | TBL | 82 | 25 | 34 | 59 | +1 | 66 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 164 | 15.2 | 18:42 |
| 2022-23 | TBL | 82 | 27 | 37 | 64 | +18 | 45 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 143 | 18.9 | 17:13 |
| 2023-24 | ANA | 63 | 18 | 18 | 36 | -15 | 54 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 145 | 12.4 | 18:44 |
| 2024-25 | ANA | 82 | 19 | 18 | 37 | +12 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 134 | 14.2 | 17:17 |
| 2025-26 so far | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 950 | 235 | 304 | 539 | +93 | 565 | 43 | 5 | 44 | 1861 | 12.6 | 17:14 |
This Season So Far
The 2025-26 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.
Last Season
19 goals and 18 assists in 82 games for 37 points, plus-12 on a club with a minus-44 goal differential — the highest rating on the roster by 4 and the single oddest number in this chapter.
48 per cent at five-on-five, the 31st percentile, and on-ice goals of 40-39 against an expected 40-43. 82 games at 35.
The Finesse Game
A veteran’s game played entirely from the right places. 33 per cent of his shots come from inside 20 feet, he converts at a rate above his career average, and none of it depends on beating anybody one-on-one.
The hands are good in tight and the passing is quick and simple. What has gone is any ability to create off the rush; he is a player who works below the goal line and in front of the net, and every point comes from there.
The Physical Game
6-1 and 205, and he still plays hard in the areas that hurt. He goes to the net front, he wins pucks on the wall, and he has an edge that has made him disliked for a decade.
30 penalty minutes across 82 games is disciplined for the style. The durability is the remarkable part — a full season at 35 after two Cups’ worth of playoff hockey.
The Intangibles
Two Cups in Tampa and then a free-agent contract on a rebuilding club that has been criticised from the day it was signed, largely fairly.
What the criticism misses is what he actually did: 82 games, 19 goals, and a plus-12 on a team that was outscored by 44. He is the only forward here who has won anything, on a roster of 21-year-olds. That is worth something the box score does not record, and it is still an expensive way to buy it.
The numbers underneath
On the ice
Five-on-five, 2024-25 · 1,049 minutes
- Expected goals
- 48%
- 31st pct
- Shot attempts
- 50.6%
- 60th pct
share of the chances while he was out there
share of the attempts while he was out there
Goals while he was on the ice: 40 for, 39 against. Expected: 39.9 and 43.3.
The eye and the numbers
HindsightThe report ranks him 45 points above where the numbers do. It was written for a back edition, with the seasons that followed already known. Neither the agreement nor the gap says anything about the eye, and this report is excluded from the club-level comparison for the same reason. Why the numbers land there sets out the club he did it on, the minutes he played and the men he played them with.
Both bars are percentiles among the 357 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 77 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.
Usual linemates
2024-25 · 1049 minutes at five-on-five
- Leo Carlsson70%
- Trevor Zegrasnow PHI35%
Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.
Why the numbers land there
Five-on-five, 2024-25
- The club
- ANA took 44.6% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 48.0% — 3.4 above the club he did it on.
- The role
- Second line, 1,049 minutes at five-on-five — 68th percentile in ice time.
With and without
| Teammate | Together | Him apart | Mate apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leo Carlsson | 46.2% | 53.0% | 39.6% |
| Trevor Zegras | 45.7% | 49.4% | 40.6% |
| Radko Gudas | 47.4% | 48.2% | 45.9% |
46.2% together, 53.0% for him apart and 39.6% for Carlsson apart. He was carrying it: the share stayed with him and left Carlsson behind.
Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.
Where he shoots from
goal on goal missed
198 unblocked shots in 2024-25, 19 of them goals. His median goal came from 17 feet. 33% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 29% from beyond forty.