This is the 2022-23 edition — an archived read. Read the 2023-24 report →
Torey Krug
St. Louis Blues Defense
The 20th-softest chair of 652 skaters, and the 9th-worst penalty differential of 202 defencemen.
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | PP | SH | GW | S | S% | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | BOS | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 17:08 |
| 2012-13 | BOS | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 15:47 |
| 2013-14 | BOS | 79 | 14 | 26 | 40 | +18 | 28 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 183 | 7.6 | 17:31 |
| 2014-15 | BOS | 78 | 12 | 27 | 39 | +13 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 205 | 5.9 | 19:36 |
| 2015-16 | BOS | 81 | 4 | 40 | 44 | +9 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 244 | 1.6 | 21:37 |
| 2016-17 | BOS | 81 | 8 | 43 | 51 | -10 | 37 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 208 | 3.9 | 21:36 |
| 2017-18 | BOS | 76 | 14 | 45 | 59 | 0 | 36 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 197 | 7.1 | 20:24 |
| 2018-19 | BOS | 64 | 6 | 47 | 53 | -2 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 151 | 4.0 | 21:18 |
| 2019-20 | BOS | 61 | 9 | 40 | 49 | -4 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 144 | 6.3 | 20:29 |
| 2020-21 | STL | 51 | 2 | 30 | 32 | +11 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 110 | 1.8 | 22:33 |
| 2021-22 | STL | 64 | 9 | 34 | 43 | +23 | 48 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 119 | 7.6 | 20:34 |
| 2022-23 so far | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 638 | 78 | 334 | 412 | +57 | 293 | 28 | 2 | 15 | 1564 | 5.0 | 20:31 |
This Season So Far
The 2022-23 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.
Last Season
64 games, 9 goals and 34 assists at 20:34 a night, plus-23, forty-eight penalty minutes, 119 shots. Three of the nine came on the power play and one short-handed. Undrafted, and 638 NHL games and 412 points across eleven seasons out of it.
The Finesse Game
Forty-four per cent of his points came on the power play, the 96th percentile among the 202 defencemen who played forty games, off 2:49 a night at the point at the 89th.
And the chair is the softest on this roster by six points. He started 64.4 per cent of his end-zone shifts in the attacking end — 443 against 245 — which is the 20th-highest of the 652 skaters who took two hundred end-zone starts.
Out of it he took 48.3 per cent of the expected goals, the 37th percentile, and 48.8 per cent of the attempts, the 38th. Both are below even, from the twentieth-softest deployment in hockey.
5.43 shots per 60 is the 75th percentile from a 49-foot median with nine per cent of them from inside twenty feet. He shoots a great deal and from a long way out.
1.23 even-strength points per 60 is the 81st percentile and his ice went 67-41 against an expectation of 47.26-50.63 — twenty more goals in front than the model asked, on the club that finished 2nd in the league in finishing.
The Physical Game
5-9 and 194 pounds, and 1.09 penalties taken per 60 is the 89th percentile against 0.32 drawn at the 34th. The net of minus-0.775 is the 9th-worst of all 202 defencemen.
2.42 hits per 60 is the 24th percentile and 3.19 blocks the 17th.
The Intangibles
21.2 mph is the 16th percentile among defencemen and 0.4 bursts over twenty miles an hour per 60 the 7th — the fewest of any defenceman on this roster.
This is the part of the file worth sitting with. A 5-9 offensive defenceman is expected to be quick, and the tracking says he is not: bottom-fifth top speed, almost never above twenty miles an hour, and an ordinary amount of ground covered.
Nothing here measures edges, pivots or how he escapes a forecheck, which is what a small man of this kind is usually praised for, and the record cannot confirm it either way.
He is 31 with 334 career assists. The power play, the vision and eleven seasons of production are real. A losing possession share out of the twentieth-softest chair in the league, the worst penalty ledger on the club and no speed to fall back on are what the numbers add.
What kind of player
The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.
- measuredcomputed here from the season's own data
- a strengthread out of the prose, and claimed
Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.
- sheltered· is started in the attacking end
64% of his end-zone starts in the attacking end, 98th percentile among defencemen
Season to season, this measure repeats well (0.66) · 47% keep it
“Undrafted, and 638 NHL games and 412 points across eleven seasons out of it.”
The numbers underneath
On the ice
Five-on-five, 2021-22 · 1,081 minutes
- Expected goals
- 48.3%
- 41st pct
- Shot attempts
- 48.8%
- 43rd pct
share of the chances while he was out there
share of the attempts while he was out there
Goals while he was on the ice: 67 for, 41 against. Expected: 47.3 and 50.6.
The eye and the numbers
HindsightThe report ranks him 29 points above where the numbers do. It was written for a back edition, with the seasons that followed already known. Neither the agreement nor the gap says anything about the eye, and this report is excluded from the club-level comparison for the same reason. Why the numbers land there sets out the club he did it on, the minutes he played and the men he played them with.
Both bars are percentiles among the 649 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 65 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.
Tracked
NHL Edge, 2021-22 · 64 games
- Top speed
- 21.2 mph
- 37th pct
- Bursts over 20 mph
- 0.14 a game
- Distance
- 2.88 miles a game
- Hardest shot
- 93.9 mph
- 61st pct
fastest he was clocked all season; the league's average best is 21.5
how often he reaches that speed, not how fast he goes
skated, all strengths
one shot; the league's average best is 90.4
A top speed is a season's best, and a man who takes more shifts gets more tries at one; the percentile is the feed's own, against every skater, and says less between a top-pair defenceman and a fourth-line wing than it does between two men in the same job. The counts are shown per game for the same reason.
Usual linemates
2021-22 · 1081 minutes at five-on-five
- Justin Faulk63%
Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.
Why the numbers land there
Five-on-five, 2021-22
- The club
- STL took 48.2% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 48.3% — 0.1 above the club he did it on.
- The role
- Second pair, 1,081 minutes at five-on-five — 73rd percentile in ice time.
With and without
| Teammate | Together | Him apart | Mate apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Faulk | 48.8% | 47.3% | 50.2% |
| Vladimir Tarasenko | 46.7% | 49.1% | 49.4% |
| Robert Thomas | 49.3% | 47.8% | 53.1% |
48.8% together, 47.3% for him apart and 50.2% for Faulk apart. Splitting them up moved neither man. Whatever is driving the share, it is not this pairing.
Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.
Where he shoots from
goal on goal missed
164 unblocked shots in 2021-22, 9 of them goals. His median goal came from 34 feet. 7% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 69% from beyond forty.