This is the 2022-23 edition — an archived read. Read the 2026-27 report →
Neal Pionk
Winnipeg Jets Defense
Three goals from 140 shots, and six fewer against on his ice than the model asked.
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | PP | SH | GW | S | S% | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | NYR | 28 | 1 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 1.8 | 22:23 |
| 2018-19 | NYR | 73 | 6 | 20 | 26 | -16 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 132 | 4.5 | 21:10 |
| 2019-20 | WPG | 71 | 6 | 39 | 45 | +10 | 32 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 177 | 3.4 | 23:23 |
| 2020-21 | WPG | 54 | 3 | 29 | 32 | +6 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 3.0 | 21:58 |
| 2021-22 | WPG | 77 | 3 | 31 | 34 | +5 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 140 | 2.1 | 21:08 |
| 2022-23 so far | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 303 | 19 | 132 | 151 | +4 | 145 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 603 | 3.1 | 21:56 |
This Season So Far
The 2022-23 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.
Last Season
77 games, 3 goals and 31 assists at 21:08 a night, plus-5, forty-six penalty minutes, 140 shots, one power-play goal. Undrafted, and 303 games and 132 assists across five seasons out of it.
The Finesse Game
Three goals from 140 shots is 2.1 per cent, the 26th-lowest conversion of the 202 defencemen who played forty games — and 5.16 shots per 60 is the 69th percentile, so the volume is there and nothing is going in.
A 53-foot median with seventy-eight per cent of his attempts from beyond forty feet.
0.96 even-strength points per 60 is the 51st percentile and thirty-five per cent of his points came on the power play, off 2:11 a night at the 82nd percentile.
Thirty-one assists in seventy-seven games, which is the fourth time in five seasons he has cleared twenty.
46.8 per cent of the expected goals is the 57th-lowest of all 202 defencemen and 46.9 per cent of the attempts the 22nd percentile. Those are bad numbers and they belong to a man playing twenty-one minutes a night.
And the goal ledger disagrees with them. His ice went 58-57 against an expectation of 55.67-63.41 — two ahead in front and six fewer against than the model asked. A 22nd-percentile attempt share that conceded six fewer than expected is the goaltending, and Winnipeg’s rated 8th in the league.
2.51 giveaways per 60 is the 28th-most of the 202.
The Physical Game
6-0 and 190 pounds, and forty-six penalty minutes in seventy-seven games.
6.82 hits per 60 is the 83rd percentile at that size, which is a real number, and 3.35 blocks per 60 the 23rd percentile, against 1:03 a night short-handed at the 28th.
0.74 penalties drawn per 60 is the 90th percentile among defencemen against 0.85 taken.
The Intangibles
22.4 mph is the 70th percentile among the 192 tracked defencemen, 0.9 bursts over twenty miles an hour per 60 the 24th and 8.56 miles per 60 the 60th. Quick enough, almost never sprinting, ordinary ground covered.
With Brenden Dillon he took 47.8 per cent of the attempts across 1,541 — the largest pairing in this chapter. Pionk apart from him was 45.1 and Dillon apart from Pionk 49.7. The pair is better than Pionk alone and worse than Dillon alone, which is a clear enough reading.
He is 27, undrafted out of Minnesota-Duluth, with 151 points in 303 games. The assists and the hit rate are real and the possession shares at twenty-one minutes are the problem. Three goals from 140 shots will correct itself; a 22nd-percentile attempt share on the second pair will not.
What kind of player
The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.
- a strengthread out of the prose, and claimed
Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.
“Undrafted, and 303 games and 132 assists across five seasons out of it.”
The numbers underneath
On the ice
Five-on-five, 2021-22 · 1,346 minutes
- Expected goals
- 46.8%
- 29th pct
- Shot attempts
- 46.9%
- 28th pct
share of the chances while he was out there
share of the attempts while he was out there
Goals while he was on the ice: 58 for, 57 against. Expected: 55.7 and 63.4.
The eye and the numbers
HindsightThe report ranks him 58 points above where the numbers do. It was written for a back edition, with the seasons that followed already known. Neither the agreement nor the gap says anything about the eye, and this report is excluded from the club-level comparison for the same reason. Why the numbers land there sets out the club he did it on, the minutes he played and the men he played them with.
Both bars are percentiles among the 649 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 70 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.
Tracked
NHL Edge, 2021-22 · 77 games
- Top speed
- 22.4 mph
- 80th pct
- Bursts over 20 mph
- 0.31 a game
- Distance
- 3.02 miles a game
- Hardest shot
- 94.8 mph
- 67th pct
fastest he was clocked all season; the league's average best is 21.5
how often he reaches that speed, not how fast he goes
skated, all strengths
one shot; the league's average best is 90.4
A top speed is a season's best, and a man who takes more shifts gets more tries at one; the percentile is the feed's own, against every skater, and says less between a top-pair defenceman and a fourth-line wing than it does between two men in the same job. The counts are shown per game for the same reason.
Usual linemates
2021-22 · 1346 minutes at five-on-five
- Nate Schmidt14%
- Dylan Samberg8%
Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.
Why the numbers land there
Five-on-five, 2021-22
- The club
- WPG took 50.1% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 46.8% — 3.3 below the club he did it on.
- The role
- Second pair, 1,346 minutes at five-on-five — 92nd percentile in ice time.
With and without
| Teammate | Together | Him apart | Mate apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brenden Dillon | 47.8% | 45.1% | 49.7% |
| Kyle Connor | 45.6% | 47.4% | 51.9% |
| Pierre-Luc Dubois | 50.0% | 45.3% | 54.3% |
47.8% together, 45.1% for him apart and 49.7% for Dillon apart. Splitting them up moved neither man. Whatever is driving the share, it is not this pairing.
Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.
Where he shoots from
goal on goal missed
191 unblocked shots in 2021-22, 3 of them goals. His median goal came from 40 feet. 10% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 78% from beyond forty.