Armchair Hockey Scout

Ask the book

2025-26 edition Ask a direct question about this edition of the book — who, how many, how common, which group more — and it is answered with a table computed on this page from the edition’s index: the season line, height and age, the on-ice percentiles, the grades and the traits read out of every report. Ask for a view on named players — what a comparison comes down to, what makes a man — and you get the book’s reading of their own pages, and only those. The model turns your question into a query and phrases the result, or reads the pages it is handed; it never originates a figure, and an answer carrying a figure that is on neither the table nor the pages is withheld. It does not forecast, and it says so when a question is outside what the book holds.

Tables are computed on this page from the 2025-26 edition’s index; readings rest on the players’ own pages; the model never counts. Twenty questions an hour.

This is the 2025-26 edition — an archived read. Read the 2026-27 report →

90

Joe Veleno

Montreal Canadiens Center

17 points, a minus-23, and a fourth-line centre on his third organisation at 25.

SeasonTeamGPGAPTS+/-PIMPPSHGWSS%TOI
2020-21DET510104100812.515:06
2021-22DET668715-14220007311.013:13
2022-23DET8191120-12301018510.612:47
2023-24DET80121628-16253018614.013:57
2024-25DET/CHI748917-23170007510.712:07
2025-26 so far—————————————
Career—306384381-659850232711.613:04

This Season So Far

The 2025-26 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.

Last Season

8 goals and 9 assists in 74 games for 17 points, minus-23, on 12:07 a night between Detroit and Seattle.

75 shots in 74 games and 8 goals at 10.7 per cent. The rating is among the worst in this chapter and it came in twelve minutes a night.

The Finesse Game

The skating is genuine and nothing else has arrived. 17 points is close to his rate across five seasons and his career high is 21.

He was an exceptional-status junior who has become a fourth-line centre, and 9 assists in 74 games says the playmaking never translated.

The Physical Game

6-1 and 201, and honest without being heavy. He forechecks at speed and does not win many pucks below the goal line.

17 penalty minutes over 74 games is disciplined and on a club with the league’s busiest penalty kill that is worth something.

The Intangibles

A first-round pick, exceptional status in junior at 15, and three organisations by 25.

Montreal signed a local player cheaply for a fourth-line job. The projection is 15 points and penalty killing, which is what he is.

What kind of player

The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.

  • measuredcomputed here from the season's own data
  • a strengthread out of the prose, and claimed
  • he lacks itraised, and he does not have it

Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.

  • perimeter· shoots from the outside, by choice or because he cannot get in

    30.5% of his attempts from 40 feet or beyond, 91st percentile among forwards

    Season to season, this measure repeats well (0.66) · 50% keep it

  • forechecks-aggressivelya strength· first man in, and on the puck

    “He forechecks at speed and does not win many pucks below the goal line.”

  • wins-the-wallhe lacks it· the corners and below the goal line

    “does not win many pucks below the goal line”

  • playmakerhe lacks it· passes up the shot a scorer takes

    “9 assists in 74 games says the playmaking never translated.”

  • penalty-killera strength· trusted a man short

    “The projection is 15 points and penalty killing, which is what he is.”

  • nastyhe lacks it· hard to play against; the edge is the point

    “17 penalty minutes over 74 games is disciplined and on a club with the league's busiest penalty kill that is worth something.”

The numbers underneath

On the ice

Five-on-five, 2024-25 · 802 minutes

Expected goals
41.5%
6th pct

share of the chances while he was out there

Shot attempts
45.1%
13th pct

share of the attempts while he was out there

Goals while he was on the ice: 18 for, 39 against. Expected: 23.3 and 32.9.

The eye and the numbers

Hindsight
Report
21st
Numbers
6th

The two rank him within 15 points of one another. It was written for a back edition, with the seasons that followed already known. Neither the agreement nor the gap says anything about the eye, and this report is excluded from the club-level comparison for the same reason.

Both bars are percentiles among the 637 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 67 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.

Tracked

NHL Edge, 2024-25 · 74 games

Top speed
22.3 mph
53rd pct

fastest he was clocked all season; the league's average best is 22.2

Bursts over 20 mph
1.54 a game

how often he reaches that speed, not how fast he goes

Distance
2.00 miles a game

skated, all strengths

Hardest shot
90.9 mph
83rd pct

one shot; the league's average best is 83.9

A top speed is a season's best, and a man who takes more shifts gets more tries at one; the percentile is the feed's own, against every skater, and says less between a top-pair defenceman and a fourth-line wing than it does between two men in the same job. The counts are shown per game for the same reason.

Usual linemates

2024-25 with DET · 630 minutes at five-on-five

Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.

Why the numbers land there

Five-on-five, 2024-25

The club
CHI took 43.2% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 41.5% — 1.7 below the club he did it on.
The role
802 minutes at five-on-five — 36th percentile in ice time.

With and without

TeammateTogetherHim apartMate apart
Ben Chiarot40.7%41.8%45.6%
Christian Fischer37.1%43.0%40.4%
Moritz Seider43.1%40.8%51.3%

40.7% together, 41.8% for him apart and 45.6% for Chiarot apart. Chiarot was better away from him while his own share held, which is a mark against him more than for him.

Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.

Where he shoots from

goal on goal missed

105 unblocked shots in 2024-25, 8 of them goals. His median goal came from 17 feet. 38% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 30% from beyond forty.