Armchair Hockey Scout

Ask the book

2022-23 edition Ask a direct question about this edition of the book — who, how many, how common, which group more — and it is answered with a table computed on this page from the edition’s index: the season line, height and age, the on-ice percentiles, the grades and the traits read out of every report. Ask for a view on named players — what a comparison comes down to, what makes a man — and you get the book’s reading of their own pages, and only those. The model turns your question into a query and phrases the result, or reads the pages it is handed; it never originates a figure, and an answer carrying a figure that is on neither the table nor the pages is withheld. It does not forecast, and it says so when a question is outside what the book holds.

Tables are computed on this page from the 2022-23 edition’s index; readings rest on the players’ own pages; the model never counts. Twenty questions an hour.

This is the 2022-23 edition — an archived read. Read the 2026-27 report →

30

Frederik Andersen

Carolina Hurricanes Goaltender

Thirty-five wins and a .9224 in 52 games, on a club whose goaltending finished 18.7 goals ahead of its chances.

SeasonTeamGPWLOTLGAGAASOSASV%
2013-14ANA282050602.290783.923
2014-15ANA54351251232.3831436.914
2015-16ANA432297882.3031086.919
2016-17TOR663316141692.6742052.918
2017-18TOR66382151822.8152211.918
2018-19TOR60361671622.7711958.917
2019-20TOR52291371432.8531577.909
2020-21TOR241383702.960668.895
2021-22CAR52351431112.1741431.922
2022-23 so far——————————
Career—4452611145111082.592313202.916

This Season So Far

The 2022-23 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.

Last Season

52 games, 35-14-3, a .9224 save percentage and a 2.17 goals-against average, with 4 shutouts on 1,431 shots faced.

Thirty-five wins and a .9224, one season after being run out of Toronto. He had posted a .8951 in his final Maple Leafs year.

Carolina’s goaltending finished 18.7 goals ahead of the chances it faced, 4th in the league, and the club allowed 202 goals — fewer than any team in hockey.

The caveat is the defence and it is a real one. Carolina took 55.2 per cent of the chances at five-on-five, 3rd, and its penalty kill was the best in the league. 27 shots a night in front of the best structure in the East is the friendliest crease in the conference. The 18.7 says he was still better than it.

The Physical Game

6-4 and 229, and he takes away the net by filling it and staying square rather than by reaching. He is an economical, upright goaltender who does not scramble, which is what makes the rebound control workable despite ordinary lateral quickness.

His career line across 445 games is a .9161 with 261 wins, and last season was comfortably the best of it by save percentage.

The Mental Game

Five seasons in Toronto ended with a playoff record everybody remembers and a save percentage nobody could defend, and he arrived here on a two-year contract that was widely read as a fallback.

Then he won 35 games. Whether that is a goaltender restored or a goaltender rescued by a system is the question this page cannot answer, and 1,431 shots is not enough to.

The Intangibles

Eighty-seventh overall in 2012 by Anaheim — he had also been drafted in 2010 by Carolina and not signed — and 445 games across Anaheim, Toronto and now here.

He is 33, in the last year of that contract, sharing the net with a thirty-three-year-old on his own last year. Carolina has the best defensive structure in hockey and two goaltenders who will both be free agents in July, and Pyotr Kochetkov, who played three games last season, is the only one signed beyond it.

What kind of player

The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.

  • a strengthread out of the prose, and claimed

Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.

  • tracks-traffica strength· finds it through a screen

    “6-4 and 229, and he takes away the net by filling it and staying square rather than by reaching”