This is the 2022-23 edition — an archived read. Read the 2026-27 report →
Kyle Capobianco
Winnipeg Jets Defense
The 6th-lowest expected-goal share of 202 defencemen and the 4th-worst penalty differential.
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | PP | SH | GW | S | S% | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | ARI | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 13:33 |
| 2018-19 | ARI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 16:05 |
| 2019-20 | ARI | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10.0 | 14:46 |
| 2020-21 | ARI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 14:28 |
| 2021-22 | ARI | 45 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -12 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 40 | 5.0 | 16:00 |
| 2022-23 so far | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 59 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -18 | 42 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 54 | 5.6 | 15:43 |
This Season So Far
The 2022-23 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.
Last Season
45 games for Arizona, 2 goals and 7 assists at 16:00 a night, minus-12, thirty-eight penalty minutes, 40 shots, one power-play goal and one game-winner. Sixty-third overall in 2015 by Arizona — the third round — five seasons, 59 games, 10 points.
The Finesse Game
41.4 per cent of the expected goals is the 6th-lowest of all 202 defencemen who played forty games, and 44.0 per cent of the attempts the 7th percentile.
Arizona finished 32nd in the league in both attempt share and chance share and conceded 313 goals, which is most of it and is not all of it: he started 50.4 per cent of his end-zone shifts in the attacking end, an even chair, and came out thirteen points beneath it.
Two goals from forty shots is 5.0 per cent on 3.33 shots per 60, the 22nd percentile, from a 46-foot median — but twenty per cent of his attempts came from inside twenty feet, the 95th percentile among defencemen, which is the one genuinely distinctive thing in the file.
0.61 even-strength points per 60 is the 14th percentile.
2.58 giveaways per 60 is the 90th percentile.
His ice went 27-38 against an expectation of 24.27-34.33 — nearly three ahead in front and almost four more against.
The Physical Game
1.50 penalties taken per 60 is the 8th-most of all 202 defencemen against 0.50 drawn, which is a net of minus 1.00 — the 4th-worst at the position.
Only Ian Cole, Zach Bogosian and Niko Mikkola were worse, and thirty-eight penalty minutes came out of forty-five games.
3.58 hits per 60 is the 45th percentile and 3.83 blocks the 41st, at 6-3 and 194 pounds, against eight seconds a night short-handed.
The Intangibles
21.6 mph is the 32nd percentile among the 192 tracked defencemen, 1.1 bursts over twenty miles an hour per 60 the 35th and 8.68 miles per 60 the 75th. His shot is 89.3 mph, the 13th percentile — the softest on this blue line by four and a half miles an hour.
He is 25, a third-round pick, with ten points in fifty-nine games across five seasons — fifty-nine games in five years is the number the file turns on.
The slot share and the mileage are two small positives. A 6th-percentile chance share and the 4th-worst penalty differential at the position are what a seventh defenceman’s record looks like, and Arizona explains a great deal of the first without touching the second.
What kind of player
The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.
- measuredcomputed here from the season's own data
- he lacks itraised, and he does not have it
Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.
- slot-man· shoots from where goals are scored
19.7% of his attempts in the slot, 95th percentile among defencemen
Season to season, this measure repeats well (0.69) · 44% keep it
“1.50 penalties taken per 60 is the 8th-most of all 202 defencemen against 0.50 drawn, which is a net of minus 1.00 — the 4th-worst at the position.”
The numbers underneath
On the ice
Five-on-five, 2021-22 · 671 minutes
- Expected goals
- 41.4%
- 5th pct
- Shot attempts
- 44%
- 10th pct
share of the chances while he was out there
share of the attempts while he was out there
Goals while he was on the ice: 27 for, 38 against. Expected: 24.3 and 34.3.
The eye and the numbers
HindsightThe report ranks him 28 points above where the numbers do. It was written for a back edition, with the seasons that followed already known. Neither the agreement nor the gap says anything about the eye, and this report is excluded from the club-level comparison for the same reason. Why the numbers land there sets out the club he did it on, the minutes he played and the men he played them with.
Both bars are percentiles among the 649 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 57 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.
Tracked
NHL Edge, 2021-22 · 45 games
- Top speed
- 21.6 mph
- 51st pct
- Bursts over 20 mph
- 0.29 a game
- Distance
- 2.32 miles a game
- Hardest shot
- 89.3 mph
- 32nd pct
fastest he was clocked all season; the league's average best is 21.5
how often he reaches that speed, not how fast he goes
skated, all strengths
one shot; the league's average best is 90.4
A top speed is a season's best, and a man who takes more shifts gets more tries at one; the percentile is the feed's own, against every skater, and says less between a top-pair defenceman and a fourth-line wing than it does between two men in the same job. The counts are shown per game for the same reason.
Usual linemates
2021-22 with ARI · 671 minutes at five-on-five
Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.
Why the numbers land there
Five-on-five, 2021-22
- The club
- ARI took 42.8% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 41.4% — 1.4 below the club he did it on.
- The role
- 671 minutes at five-on-five — 30th percentile in ice time.
With and without
| Teammate | Together | Him apart | Mate apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Kessel | 41.9% | 41.2% | 44.0% |
| Travis Boyd | 44.9% | 40.0% | 42.8% |
| Vladislav Kolyachonok | 44.2% | 40.5% | 46.1% |
41.9% together, 41.2% for him apart and 44.0% for Kessel apart. Splitting them up moved neither man. Whatever is driving the share, it is not this pairing.
Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.
Where he shoots from
goal on goal missed
61 unblocked shots in 2021-22, 2 of them goals. His median goal came from 51 feet. 13% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 57% from beyond forty.