Donovan Sebrango
Florida Panthers Defense
68 penalty minutes, no goals, and 60 shots from a median of 54 feet.
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | PP | SH | GW | S | S% | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | OTT | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 10:19 |
| 2025-26 | OTT/FLA | 42 | 0 | 8 | 8 | -5 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0.0 | 15:06 |
| 2026-27 so far | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 44 | 0 | 8 | 8 | -6 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0.0 | 14:53 |
This Season So Far
The 2026-27 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.
Last Season
No goals and 8 assists in 42 games, minus-5, at 15:06 a night with 68 penalty minutes. His 5-on-5 work was done in Ottawa.
The Finesse Game
61 unblocked attempts from a median of 54 feet, 5 per cent from inside 20, and not 1 goal. No goals in 44 career NHL games.
8 assists in 42 games. He makes the short pass and defends; there is no evidence of anything else and the club is not asking.
The Physical Game
6-2 and 223, which is heavy, and it is why he plays. 68 penalty minutes in 42 games is a very high rate for a third-pair defenceman, and he is willing in front of his own net.
The Intangibles
47.6 per cent of the expected goals, 33rd percentile, in 601 minutes, with the goals 27-32 against and the chances 24.1 to 26.6.
Some of that gap is Ottawa’s goaltending, which cost Brady Tkachuk 21 goals on the same club. Most of the rate is his.
He is 24, a third-round pick on his second organisation, and joins a Florida blue line already 6 deep. 5 points in his last 10, which is the most encouraging run on the page.
There is not enough here to grade with confidence. Ask again if he gets a season.
What kind of player
The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.
- measuredcomputed here from the season's own data
Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.
- perimeter· shoots from the outside, by choice or because he cannot get in
83.6% of his attempts from 40 feet or beyond, 93rd percentile among defencemen
Season to season, this measure repeats well (0.66) · 50% keep it
The numbers underneath
On the ice
Five-on-five, 2025-26 · 601 minutes
- Expected goals
- 47.6%
- 33rd pct
- Shot attempts
- 49.2%
- 50th pct
share of the chances while he was out there
share of the attempts while he was out there
Goals while he was on the ice: 27 for, 32 against. Expected: 24.1 and 26.6.
The eye and the numbers
SightedThe numbers rank him 25 points above where the report does. It was written with these numbers on screen and departs from them anyway, which makes the gap a judgment rather than an oversight. Why the numbers land there sets out the club he did it on, the minutes he played and the men he played them with.
Both bars are percentiles among the 656 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 63 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.
Tracked
NHL Edge, 2025-26 · 42 games
- Top speed
- 22.1 mph
- 69th pct
- Bursts over 20 mph
- 0.69 a game
- Distance
- 2.09 miles a game
- Hardest shot
- 90.0 mph
- 47th pct
fastest he was clocked all season; the league's average best is 21.6
how often he reaches that speed, not how fast he goes
skated, all strengths
one shot; the league's average best is 88.9
A top speed is a season's best, and a man who takes more shifts gets more tries at one; the percentile is the feed's own, against every skater, and says less between a top-pair defenceman and a fourth-line wing than it does between two men in the same job. The counts are shown per game for the same reason.
Recent form
Last 20 appearances, 2025-26, oldest first
5
points in his last 10 games — 0 goals, 5 assists, 13 shots
Each bar is one game by points. Filled bars are games he scored in.
Usual linemates
2025-26 · 571 minutes at five-on-five
- Jeff Petryoff the roster30%
- Mike Benningnow CGY16%
- Seth Jones15%
Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.
Why the numbers land there
Five-on-five, 2025-26
- The club
- FLA took 50.4% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 47.6% — 2.8 below the club he did it on.
- The role
- 601 minutes at five-on-five — 24th percentile in ice time.
With and without
| Teammate | Together | Him apart | Mate apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Petry | 52.4% | 45.5% | 51.7% |
| Mackie Samoskevich | 56.4% | 44.4% | 55.4% |
| Anthony-John (AJ) Greer | 54.5% | 45.0% | 54.4% |
52.4% together, 45.5% for him apart and 51.7% for Petry apart. He was worse away from Petry, who was no better away from him — he needed that pairing more than Petry did.
Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.
Where he shoots from
goal on goal missed
61 unblocked shots in 2025-26, 0 of them goals. 5% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 84% from beyond forty.