Calen Addison
Minnesota Wild Defense
Twenty-six assists and a minus-17, and eighty-seven per cent of his shots came from beyond forty feet.
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | PP | SH | GW | S | S% | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | MIN | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 18:31 |
| 2021-22 | MIN | 15 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 11.8 | 13:47 |
| 2022-23 | MIN | 62 | 3 | 26 | 29 | -17 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 77 | 3.9 | 16:07 |
| 2023-24 so far | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 80 | 5 | 28 | 33 | -21 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 98 | 5.1 | 15:46 |
This Season So Far
The 2023-24 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.
Last Season
3 goals and 26 assists in 62 games — 29 points — and minus-17. 16:07 a night, 77 shots, 22 penalty minutes.
Twenty-six assists from a twenty-two-year-old defenceman is a genuine number. The minus-17 is the largest on the club by eight.
49.8 per cent of the expected goals at five-on-five, the 50th percentile — dead average — with his ice at 27-41 against an expectation of 29.62-29.83. Eleven goals worse at the defensive end than the chances deserved, on a club whose goaltending finished fourth in the league.
That is the interesting part. The chance share says average; the goals say disaster; and the goaltending was not the explanation. What is left is a defenceman whose mistakes happen close to the net.
Three seasons, 80 games, 33 points.
The Finesse Game
77 shots at a median of 54 feet, 4 per cent from inside twenty and 87 per cent from beyond forty — one of the two most perimeter shot distributions of any defenceman in these five chapters.
Beyond forty: 65 shots on goal, 3 goals, 4.62 per cent. Inside forty: 11 shots and no goals.
Eleven shots from inside forty feet across sixty-two games. He does not leave the blue line, and 48 of his 106 tracked attempts were slap shots — nearly half, in a league where the defencemen’s share has fallen to 24.17 per cent.
86.3 mph at the 18th percentile, on that slap-shot volume, which makes it one of the more meaningful readings in this chapter and not a flattering one: he takes the shot the measurement is built on and does not drive it.
The 26 assists come from the first pass and the power play, not from the shot.
The Physical Game
5-11 and 173, and 22 penalty minutes.
Top speed 22.9 mph, the 82nd percentile; bursts 0.6 a game, the 30th; 2.28 miles a game, the 31st.
He skates well and does not defend. At 173 pounds he cannot win a battle in front of his own net and he does not take the body anywhere else on the ice, and the eleven-goal gap between his expected and actual goals against is the shape that leaves.
Minnesota dresses three of the five lightest defencemen in the league and he is one of them.
The Intangibles
Fifty-third overall in 2018 to Pittsburgh, traded to Minnesota at nineteen in the Jason Zucker deal, and eighty NHL games since.
59.2 per cent of his five-on-five shifts started in the attacking zone, the 88th percentile — the most favourable deployment on the blue line, which makes the 50th-percentile chance share worse rather than better.
He is twenty-three, he can move a puck, and the defensive record is the worst on the club. That is a familiar profile and the resolution of it is usually decided by the coach rather than by the player.
What kind of player
The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.
- measuredcomputed here from the season's own data
- a strengthread out of the prose, and claimed
- he lacks itraised, and he does not have it
Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.
- perimeter· shoots from the outside, by choice or because he cannot get in
86.7% of his attempts from 40 feet or beyond, 99th percentile among defencemen
Season to season, this measure repeats well (0.66) · 50% keep it
- sheltered· is started in the attacking end
59% of his end-zone starts in the attacking end, 91st percentile among defencemen
Season to season, this measure repeats well (0.66) · 47% keep it
“The 26 assists come from the first pass and the power play, not from the shot.”
“At 173 pounds he cannot win a battle in front of his own net and he does not take the body anywhere else on the ice, and the eleven-goal gap between his expected and actual goals against is the shape that leaves.”
“He skates well and does not defend.”
The numbers underneath
On the ice
Five-on-five, 2022-23 · 762 minutes
- Expected goals
- 49.8%
- 50th pct
- Shot attempts
- 50.7%
- 59th pct
share of the chances while he was out there
share of the attempts while he was out there
Goals while he was on the ice: 27 for, 41 against. Expected: 29.6 and 29.8.
The eye and the numbers
HindsightThe numbers rank him 26 points above where the report does. It was written for a back edition, with the seasons that followed already known. Neither the agreement nor the gap says anything about the eye, and this report is excluded from the club-level comparison for the same reason. Why the numbers land there sets out the club he did it on, the minutes he played and the men he played them with.
Both bars are percentiles among the 638 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 60 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.
Tracked
NHL Edge, 2022-23 · 62 games
- Top speed
- 22.9 mph
- 94th pct
- Bursts over 20 mph
- 0.61 a game
- Distance
- 2.28 miles a game
- Hardest shot
- 86.3 mph
- 22nd pct
fastest he was clocked all season; the league's average best is 21.5
how often he reaches that speed, not how fast he goes
skated, all strengths
one shot; the league's average best is 90.0
A top speed is a season's best, and a man who takes more shifts gets more tries at one; the percentile is the feed's own, against every skater, and says less between a top-pair defenceman and a fourth-line wing than it does between two men in the same job. The counts are shown per game for the same reason.
Usual linemates
2022-23 · 762 minutes at five-on-five
- Jon Merrill65%
- Jonas Brodin12%
Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.
Why the numbers land there
Five-on-five, 2022-23
- The club
- MIN took 50.0% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 49.8% — 0.2 below the club he did it on.
- The role
- Third pair, 762 minutes at five-on-five — 36th percentile in ice time.
With and without
| Teammate | Together | Him apart | Mate apart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jon Merrill | 51.6% | 46.4% | 41.6% |
| Mats Zuccarello | 54.1% | 47.5% | 51.2% |
| Kirill Kaprizov | 54.1% | 47.6% | 56.3% |
51.6% together, 46.4% for him apart and 41.6% for Merrill apart. Both were worse apart, so whatever the two of them had together was doing real work.
Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.
Where he shoots from
goal on goal missed
105 unblocked shots in 2022-23, 3 of them goals. His median goal came from 60 feet. 4% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 87% from beyond forty.