This is the 2025-26 edition — an archived read. Read the 2026-27 report →
Pyotr Kochetkov
Carolina Hurricanes Goaltender
An .8968 behind the best defensive team in the league, which is the worst combination of facts in this edition.
| Season | Team | GP | W | L | OTL | GA | GAA | SO | SA | SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | CAR | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2.42 | 0 | 61 | .902 |
| 2022-23 | CAR | 24 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 57 | 2.44 | 4 | 627 | .909 |
| 2023-24 | CAR | 42 | 23 | 13 | 4 | 92 | 2.33 | 4 | 1031 | .911 |
| 2024-25 | CAR | 47 | 27 | 16 | 3 | 121 | 2.60 | 2 | 1172 | .897 |
| 2025-26 so far | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 116 | 65 | 36 | 12 | 276 | 2.47 | 10 | 2891 | .904 |
This Season So Far
The 2025-26 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.
Last Season
27-16-3 in 47 games, .8968 with a 2.60 average and 2 shutouts on 1,172 shots.
Carolina led the league in chance share and finished 12th in chance suppression at 2.40 expected goals against per 60, and its goaltending still came in 13.5 goals worse than what it faced, 25th in the league. A .8968 behind this defence is a considerably worse result than the same number behind a bad one.
The Physical Game
6-3 and 196, and the game is athletic and unstructured — he moves a great deal, he is quick, and he makes spectacular saves out of positions he should not have been in.
The technique is the problem. He is square less often than a goaltender of this size should be, the depth in the crease varies shift to shift, and the rebound control is poor, which puts him in the scrambles his athleticism then has to solve. Behind a club that gives up few chances, the goals that go in tend to be the ones he created work for himself.
The Mental Game
He competes ferociously and it occasionally works against him — the game gets loud, and a goaltender who fights every puck in a low-event game is a goaltender who eventually loses one.
There is no evidence of him giving up on a night and a good deal of evidence of him being unable to settle into one.
The Intangibles
A second-round pick with genuine tools and four seasons of a save percentage that has not once been above league average.
That is now the club’s central problem. Carolina has been the best possession team in hockey for three seasons and has been eliminated in three conference finals, and the crease is where the difference is. At 26 there is time; there is not much evidence.
What kind of player
The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.
- he lacks itraised, and he does not have it
Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.
“the rebound control is poor, which puts him in the scrambles his athleticism then has to solve”
“the depth in the crease varies shift to shift”