Armchair Hockey Scout

Ask the book

2026-27 edition Ask a direct question about this edition of the book — who, how many, how common, which group more — and it is answered with a table computed on this page from the edition’s index: the season line, height and age, the on-ice percentiles, the grades and the traits read out of every report. Ask for a view on named players — what a comparison comes down to, what makes a man — and you get the book’s reading of their own pages, and only those. The model turns your question into a query and phrases the result, or reads the pages it is handed; it never originates a figure, and an answer carrying a figure that is on neither the table nor the pages is withheld. It does not forecast, and it says so when a question is outside what the book holds.

Tables are computed on this page from the 2026-27 edition’s index; readings rest on the players’ own pages; the model never counts. Twenty questions an hour.

25

Elias Pettersson

Vancouver Canucks Defense

A full season at 22, the 94th percentile in hits and the 1st in chance share.

SeasonTeamGPGAPTS+/-PIMPPSHGWSS%TOI
2024-25VAN28123-417000195.312:49
2025-26VAN703710-1639000466.514:59
2026-27 so far—————————————
Career—984913-2056000656.214:22

This Season So Far

The 2026-27 season has not started. The empty row above is his, and both it and this paragraph fill in on their own from the morning after he first plays: what he has done, what it is worth against his own last season, and the run he is on when the two disagree.

Last Season

3 goals and 7 assists in 70 games — 10 points, minus-16, at 14:59 a night. That is the 8th percentile of ice time among defencemen, and it is a full NHL season, which is more than the 28 games he had a year ago.

He turned 22 in February.

The Finesse Game

83 unblocked attempts from a median of 56 feet, 83 per cent from beyond 40 and 5 per cent from inside 20, 3 goals. He shoots from the blue line and nowhere else, exactly as the 28 games said he did.

36 of those reached the goaltender from beyond forty feet and 2 went in — 5.56 per cent, against a league rate for defencemen of 3.69. On a sample that size the number is worth very little, but it is worth more than nothing, and it points the right way.

The tracking has his hardest shot at 98.2 mph, the 86th percentile. Read that as a statement about which shot he chooses rather than how hard he can shoot: a registered maximum tracks slap-shot volume far more closely than it tracks anything else, and a man with a 56-foot median is taking slap shots from the point. Both things are true — he picks that shot, and it is a real one.

7 assists at 0.62 even-strength points an hour, the 13th percentile. He is not on the power play at all — 3 seconds a night of it — and none of his points came there. The first pass is still simple and still mostly correct, and it is still not a puck game.

22.7 mph of top speed against a league average of 21.6, the 77th percentile, with 41 bursts over 20. That figure is better than it looks and the reason is arithmetic: a maximum is taken over the shifts a man gets, and he got the 8th percentile of them. He reached a 77th-percentile top speed on a bottom-decile number of chances to reach it.

The Physical Game

6-2 and 185. 7.8 hits an hour, the 94th percentile among defencemen, and he blocks at the 71st.

A year ago this book said he was not yet strong enough to move a grown forward off the front of his own net. He is now finishing checks at close to the highest rate at the position, and that is the one thing about him that has plainly changed. Whether the strength arrived or only the willingness is not something the record can separate.

He draws more penalties than he takes — 0.92 an hour against 0.80 — which is not the usual arrangement for a defenceman playing that way.

3.9 giveaways an hour, the 89th percentile. The puck leaves him under pressure, and on this club the pressure does not stop.

The Intangibles

40.4 per cent of the expected goals, the 1st percentile, and 43.5 per cent of the shot attempts, third, across 965 minutes, with the chances 32.89 for and 48.46 against. The goals went 31-47.

Part of that is the club. Vancouver conceded 303 goals and was outchanced as a team at five-on-five, 149.4 expected goals to 193.9, so a man three points under his own club is under water in a pool that is already draining.

Part of it is the job. 41.6 per cent of his five-on-five shifts started in the attacking zone, the 15th percentile — 210 attacking draws against 295 — and 40 per cent of his even-strength time came beside Filip Hronek, the one defenceman here who was not drowning.

Neither part finishes the argument, and the club’s own blue line is the reason. Marcus Pettersson started a smaller share of his shifts in the attacking end than anyone else on the roster, 37.4 per cent, and came out at 42.5. Hronek started 52.8 and came out at 45.0. The 2 worst chance shares on this defence belong to the 2 youngest men, and the zone starts do not sort them into that order.

He is 22, he has 98 NHL games, and this is the third-round pick who was supposed to need 2 more American League seasons. The hitting is real, the shot is real, and everything the puck does when he is on the ice is bad. Those can all be true of a 22-year-old on a club that lost 303 goals, and the season that tells us which is the next one.

What kind of player

The searchable half of the report. The first group is computed from the season's own data; the rest are read out of the prose above, and each one carries the sentence that produced it. A subject the report never raised is simply absent.

  • measuredcomputed here from the season's own data

Each computed tag also says how well its measure holds up from one season to the next, because a tag describes a season that has finished and a reader will assume it predicts the one coming. Some do and some do not, and the gap is wide: five-on-five workload repeats well, scoring late does not repeat at all.

  • perimeter· shoots from the outside, by choice or because he cannot get in

    83.1% of his attempts from 40 feet or beyond, 92nd percentile among defencemen

    Season to season, this measure repeats well (0.66) · 50% keep it

The numbers underneath

On the ice

Five-on-five, 2025-26 · 965 minutes

Expected goals
40.4%
2nd pct

share of the chances while he was out there

Shot attempts
43.5%
6th pct

share of the attempts while he was out there

Goals while he was on the ice: 31 for, 47 against. Expected: 32.9 and 48.5.

The eye and the numbers

Sighted
Report
38th
Numbers
2nd

The report ranks him 36 points above where the numbers do. It was written with these numbers on screen and departs from them anyway, which makes the gap a judgment rather than an oversight. Why the numbers land there sets out the club he did it on, the minutes he played and the men he played them with.

Both bars are percentiles among the 656 skaters in this edition with a report and enough ice time. The report bar ranks the mean of the grades above — 70 on their own scale — against every other report's mean. The numbers bar ranks his share of expected goals. A gap is a disagreement about where he belongs, not two scales talking past each other.

Tracked

NHL Edge, 2025-26 · 70 games

Top speed
22.7 mph
85th pct

fastest he was clocked all season; the league's average best is 21.6

Bursts over 20 mph
0.59 a game

how often he reaches that speed, not how fast he goes

Distance
2.14 miles a game

skated, all strengths

Hardest shot
98.2 mph
90th pct

one shot; the league's average best is 88.9

A top speed is a season's best, and a man who takes more shifts gets more tries at one; the percentile is the feed's own, against every skater, and says less between a top-pair defenceman and a fourth-line wing than it does between two men in the same job. The counts are shown per game for the same reason.

Recent form

Last 20 appearances, 2025-26, oldest first

2

points in his last 10 games — 1 goals, 1 assists, 11 shots

Each bar is one game by points. Filled bars are games he scored in.

Usual linemates

2025-26 · 965 minutes at five-on-five

Share of his five-on-five ice time spent alongside each player, measured from shift charts. Special teams are excluded: a power-play unit is not a line.

Why the numbers land there

Five-on-five, 2025-26

The club
VAN took 43.5% of the expected goals as a club. His own share is 40.4% — 3.1 below the club he did it on.
The role
First pair, 965 minutes at five-on-five — 56th percentile in ice time.

With and without

TeammateTogetherHim apartMate apart
Filip Hronek38.6%41.8%47.2%
Drew O'Connor46.4%38.0%44.6%
Tyler Myers45.8%38.6%44.1%

38.6% together, 41.8% for him apart and 47.2% for Hronek apart. Both were better apart than together — the pairing was doing neither of them any favours.

Expected-goal share while both were on the ice, and for each man in the minutes he played without the other. Apart is the pair subtracted from his own totals. It does not settle who was carrying whom — apart from each other, both were still playing with somebody — but it does say whether the share travelled when the pairing broke up.

Where he shoots from

goal on goal missed

83 unblocked shots in 2025-26, 3 of them goals. His median goal came from 42 feet. 5% of his shots came from inside twenty feet, 83% from beyond forty.